Meiho University Institutional Repository:Item 987654321/1857
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 2878/3796 (76%)
Visitors : 3940988      Online Users : 576
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    MUIR > College of Business and Management >  > Papers >  Item 987654321/1857


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.meiho.edu.tw/ir/handle/987654321/1857


    Title: Is single or dual channel with different English proficiencies better for English listening comprehension, cognitive load and attitude in ubiquitous learning environment?
    Authors: Chang, Chi-Cheng
    Tseng, Kuo-Hung
    Tseng, Ju-Shih
    Keywords: Media in education
    Teaching/learning strategies
    Date: 2012-09
    Issue Date: 2012-10-03T02:49:05Z (UTC)
    Abstract: The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of English proficiency (low vs. high) and material presentation mode (single channel vs. dual channel) on English listening comprehension,cognitive load and learning attitude in a ubiquitous learning environment. An experimental learning activity was implemented using PDA as a learning tool to facilitate learning. A quasi-experimental design was employed with university students participating in the experiment. The results revealed that (a)
    high English proficiency learners had significantly better English listening comprehension and lower intrinsic and extraneous load than low English proficiency learners; (b) both high and low English
    proficiency learners learning with dual channel had significantly better English listening comprehension and held more positive attitude toward the ubiquitous learning environment than learners learning with single channel; (c) for learners learning with single channel, low English proficiency learners had significantly higher extraneous load than high English proficiency learners; and (d) for low English
    proficiency learners, learners who learned with dual channel possessed significantly lower extraneous load than learners who learned with single channel. The suggestions for educators and instructional designers were also discussed in the present study.
    Appears in Collections:[ ] Papers

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in MUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback