Meiho University Institutional Repository:Item 987654321/2090
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 2878/3796 (76%)
造访人次 : 3945952      在线人数 : 372
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于MUIR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.meiho.edu.tw/ir/handle/987654321/2090


    题名: 高中體育教科書之編輯、使用情形及評鑑研究
    作者: 劉兆達
    关键词: 課程改革;體育教師;出版社;體育課程;審查 currciulum revolution;phyiscal education teachers;publisher;physical education curriculum
    日期: 2012-10
    上传时间: 2013-09-16T07:31:13Z (UTC)
    摘要: 本研究目的有三,一是瞭解體育教科書之編輯團隊、編輯內容考量因素、所面臨之問題及困難,二是瞭解體育教科書之選用及各章節課程內容使用情形,三是瞭解體育教科書評鑑情形;方法採用訪談法及問卷調查法,訪談出版社編輯者5位、體育教師6 位及30 位學生,問卷發放給142 位體育教師填答,結果:(一)體育教科書之作者團隊為大學教師及高中體育教師兼任,編輯過程為編輯、送審、修正、審查通過、發照、各校選用及使用等7 個階段,體育教科書之審查制度不夠彈性、審查者主導編輯等。(二)選用體育教科書比例為56.3%,各章節課程內容使用率低於50%,包括:體操、有氧舞蹈(階梯有氧舞蹈、戰鬥有氧)、自行車、啦啦隊(競技、創意)、瑜珈、街舞及攀岩等課程。(三)體育教科書在出版特性出現疏漏、教材內容受限於學校場地設備及師資、教材內容與學生能力有落差、體育教科書輔助資訊不足等。結論:(一)各出版社並未聘任體育教科書研發人員,在編輯過程中並未重視實驗、試用及評鑑階段,編審過程中出現爭議,建議政府設置第三仲裁機構,針對審查過程中之爭議,透過第三者進行專業、中立、客觀之裁決。(二)體育教科書使用比例下降,某些課程內容因師資、場地設備因素,無法落實於實際教學中,建議出版社應重新思考其所編輯之體育教科書內容,是否能落實於體育教學中。(三)體育教科書之教材難度應進行調整,以符合學生能力水準,充實體育教科書輔助之網站內容及研究成果,並可成立互動專區或多媒體影音專區等。
    The purposes of this study were to understand the compilation, persons, affecting factors of learning contents, questions and mistakes of the editing process, to understand the selection and using of teaching contents, and evaluation for physical education textbooks (PETs) of senior high schools in Taiwan. Methods were interview used to collect data from 6 editors, 6 physical educators, and 30 students, and questionnaire used to collect data from 142 physical educators. Results were as follows: a)the editing committee for PETs was composed by physical educators of universities and senior high schools, the editing process had 7 steps such as editing, certification, correcting, passing, license, selection, and using by schools. b) the percentage for using PETs editing by non-government was 56.3%,and those contents were used below 50% such as gymnastic, aerobic dance, bicycle, cheerleading,yoga, street dance, and rock climbing. c) those of PETs were evaluated by physical educators such as some mistakes on publish condition, disconnection among core ability, teaching purposes and real skill teaching, inequality of teaching contents and students ability, contents limited by equipments,locations, and teachers of schools. In conclusion,non-government publishers didn't have the full-time researchers for PETs editing, and those didn't care the steps of experiment, using, and evaluation of PETs editing process. It advised that the government needed to build certificated standards for PETs to solve those problems, and to enhance the quality of PETs. In addition, the selecting rate for PETs editing by non-government of senior high schools was below. Because of the teachers, equipments, and locations of schools, some programs of PETs were not used on the real teaching situation of P.E class. It advised that publishers needed to think those how to use the real teaching situation in P.E. class.Furthermore, some contents of PETs were difficult for students of senior high schools. It advised that those needed to match the students' ability and level, to fill in more studies on the web for PETs, and to design the DVD area for PETs.
    显示于类别:[運動與休閒系] 研究計畫

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫 成果報告-劉兆達.pdf5229KbAdobe PDF2607检视/开启


    在MUIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈